Author note. I wrote this article below after seeing the "Sassy Justice" deepfake online in 2021. Since then the matter has become much more serious since the proliferation of online AI tools in the last year. Update : The proposal has been updated to include copyright of one's own voice in the wake of the Stephen Fry incident and another example of cyberstalking with facial recognition. Update 2: Denmark has just enacted this. Update 3: The USA is considering legislation like this. https://petapixel.com/2023/10/16/no-fakes-act-seeks-to-ban-unauthorized-ai-generated-likenesses Proposal to United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Pre-empting the problem of Deepfake videos Background We presently stand on the edge of an abyss in which social media threatens to uproot our world order and cast us into chaos, as we see with the recent attacks (6 January 2021) on the American Capitol by conspiracy theorists incentivised on social media. Deepfake videos are motion pic...
Having fiddled with ChatGPT for a while now, I have identified the following two risks. 1. Hallucination . It sometimes just makes stuff up. This is particularly annoying when you give it the information and it goes on a tangent and makes stuff up that was not in the source information. For example, when I gave it some meeting notes, it went on a tangent about N-P completeness in computer science. OK?!? 2. Memory errors . The memory feature that they have added messes up a lot. I have noticed that it performs two mistakes: Recites what it gave you previously , even if the topic was utterly different . For example I gave it some meeting notes to summarise and it spat out some Python code that I had asked for last year. Totally irrelevant! Recites what it gave you previously, because the content was similar , in its opinion. I created a new chat, gave it the meeting notes, and it gave me the PREVIOUS summary of the previous set of meeting notes. In one case it was even worse! It g...
So, Ramaphosa met Trump. Cue the performative outrage. But behind the cameras, away from the staged handshakes, something bigger happened. Something quieter, and a lot whiter. Let’s talk about the new policy direction that suddenly appeared in our Government Gazette on 23 May 2025. Titled with all the dull, bureaucratic camouflage they could find, it’s really about one thing: letting multinational ICT corporations into South Africa without forcing them to sell equity to black South Africans — as long as they “invest” in transformation through what they call Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (EEIPs). Sounds progressive? Read slower. It’s a corporate bypass valve, one already designed and requested long ago by the same big players who always seem to need a “special exemption” from black economic empowerment. Now, let’s talk timing. You don’t have to be a political analyst to notice that this policy shift drops immediately after Ramaphosa’s charm offensive in the US — where he rolle...